標題: Nike NFL Jerseys China Oma
duhy6t12a
給你按讚鼠爸媽
Rank: 4



UID 639
精華 0
積分 68535
帖子 22845
威望 68535
金錢 68535
學分 45690
閱讀權限 1
註冊 2017-5-25
用戶註冊天數 2592
用戶失蹤天數 1944
狀態 離線
183.160.240.208
分享 
發表於 2017-6-23 12:28  資料 私人訊息 
Nike NFL Jerseys China Oma
(Trinidad Guardian) Former Prime Minister Basdeo Panday is expected to know his fate tomorrowFormer Prime Minister Basdeo Pandayafter a second trial into charges of failing to declare a London bank account. Magistrate Marcia Murray is expected to deliver her decision when the matter resumes at 10 am in the Port-of-Spain First Magistrate’s Court.At yesterday’s hearing, Panday’s lawyer, David Aaronberg, QC,Authentic NFL Jerseys Wholesale, continued legal arguments that the lead investigator had failed to interview people pertinent to the matter and therefore the case was incomplete. Aaronberg argued the prosecution failed to prove Panday had benefited and at the time of signing the statutory declaration, he had not been “deliberately evasive or untruthful about the accounts.”Aaronberg said Panday’s wife, Oma, was the “true beneficial owner of the account.” On Monday, Aaronberg made an application to have the matter dismissed on the basis the prosecution had failed to prove its case. Panday is on trial for allegedly failing to declare a London bank account, contrary to the Integrity in Public Life Act,Cheap Jerseys From China, and is accused of failing to disclose the account at National Westminster Bank plc,Arizona Diamondbacks Fernando Rodney Jersey, Wimbledon, London, to the Integrity Commission for the years 1997 to 1999.In March 2006, Panday was found guilty and sentenced by then Chief Magistrate Sherman Mc Nichols to serve two years in prison,Dwight Howard Hawks Jersey, the maximum penalty under the law. He appealed the decision and the conviction was quashed by the Court of Appeal and a retrial ordered,Jerseys NFL Wholesale, which was upheld on appeal to the Privy Council.On Monday, Aaronberg hinted the investigation against Panday was politically motivated and said the former prime minister had not committed any wrong by failing to declare the accounts. Aaronberg said Panday was being prosecuted under the Integrity in Public Life Act 1987 but that prior to the Integrity in Public Life Act 2000 public figures were not required to declare assets belonging to their spouses.Responding to Aaronberg’s closing arguments, prosecutor Timothy Cassel,China Jerseys Cheap, QC, said monies being deposited and withdrawn from the account during the years 1997 to 1999 were “wholly disproportionate” to Panday’s yearly earnings as the prime minister.
頂部