Superintendant of Police, Hugh Jessemy, acknowledged that police had investigated no one else in relation to the murder of Queen’s College student, Neesa Gopaul.Yesterday, almost one month into the proceeding,Cheap Shoes Online Free Delivery, Prosecutor Kaulesar indicated to the court that there were three witnesses left to testify.Superintendent Jessemy had previously told the court that he had assisted with investigations in relation to the murder of the 16-year-old.?? Yesterday,Discount Shoes Online,?? he was cross examined by Defence Counsel, Lyndon Amsterdam and George Thomas in regard to the availability of evidence which was used to charge the two accused persons.The witness said that he was not aware of any sort of evidence which the police acquired to charge the two accused. Based on suggestions made by the Attorney,Womens Nike Shox Clearance, Jessemy said he was not aware whether the police had questioned the teen’s friends,Wholesale Adidas Shoes China, her neighbours or associates about the murder.The officer also acknowledged that although he was among the chief investigators in the matter he was not aware that the police had investigated anyone besides the girl’s mother and the number one accused (Small) for the murder.Jessemy also agreed that although the police had some evidence that Neesa Gopaul was killed; they were not able to ascertain where and when the incident took place.The witness was then asked whether the police had inquired from the teen’s friends after she disappeared where she was last seen or who she might have been in contact with before she went missing.In response, Jessemy told the court that he was not aware of any such investigation.The witness however noted that the police had inquired whether the teen went to the Highway with persons other than the two accused.Based on suggestions made by the defence, the witness also agreed that the police relied heavily on circumstantial evidence during the course of their investigations.He also noted that he was in receipt of no information or evidence that either of two accused persons had participated together or with anyone to murder Neesa Gopaul.Jessemy also noted that he received no information as it relates to when and where the teen was murdered. The policeman however agreed that these questions needed to be answered.The witness also acknowledged that by October 8, 2010, some six days after the body was found along the Soesdkye/Linden Highway the police had no evidence against the number one accused (Small) to institute a charge of murder.The officer had earlier stated that he held two separate confrontations between Small and Nazar Mohamed Okeeland and Bharrat Narine Samaroo at the Ruimveldt Police Station; the confrontation was in regards to a pair of dumbbells which two men had identified to be items that belonged to the accused.However, Superintendent Jessemy said that he made no record of the confrontation in his statement nor gave no such evidence in the Magistrates’ Court.Yesterday the witness was asked whether there was anyone else present at the time he carried the confrontations.Jessemy said that persons were around, while the confrontation was being carried out but he could not recall who those persons were.The detective had previously told the court that he had obtained an ordinary statement from the number two accused (Gopaul) in which she said that her daughter had become wayward some time before her death.The policeman told the court that Gopaul had related that when her daughter was in Form Two at Queen’s College, she became extremely rebellious she started sleeping out and leaving the home without permission. She had stopped listening to her parents.As such,Wholesale Air Max 2019, attorney George Thomas asked the witness whether any investigation was done to ascertain if the utterances attributed to Gopaul were true.?? Jessemy said that he had no knowledge of any such investigation.Further,Black Air Max 2019 Cheap, quizzed about the investigations,Cheap Adidas Shoes Online China, the witness noted that he was not aware of any scientific evidence linking the number one or the number two accused to the death of Neesa Gopaul.